By SHIFT Bay Area
February 2, 2026

While we were enjoying the holidays, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission quietly released Plan Bay Area 2050+ (“the Plan”). Like a Friday night White House data dump, the public release of the Plan seems designed to avoid attention — and for good reason. The more you read it, the more sense hiding it makes.
Our Bay Area region genuinely needs a coordinated plan: cities and counties face “fiscal cliffs” and structural deficits, the climate crisis is intensifying wildfires, floods, and droughts, and both federal and state budgets are under pressure. Meanwhile, rapid innovation in energy, telecommunications, and transportation could help — if policymakers allowed them to.
Unfortunately, the Plan deals successfully with almost none of these issues. It is fixated on outdated transit strategies and inflated housing targets while leaving its own proposals unfunded. Beyond that, most of its environmental impacts are officially “significant and unavoidable.” It offers no credible assessment of better alternatives or of urgent challenges outside the narrow focus of the Transit and Housing Industrial Complex (THIC).
“The Plan” affects us all, and it’s really bad! Share this with someone who needs to know why. Right now that’s most people!!
Here are major flaws in the Plan, ending with the most important of all:
- Fantasy Population Growth. The Plan assumes population increases more than 12 times higher than credible forecasts, even as the Census reports California’s population shrinking by 200,000 the past five years. Inflated projections drive wasteful megaprojects — like BART’s $3.5 billion purchase of 1,129 rail cars when only about 400 are needed — amid falling ridership and a fiscal crisis.
- No Risk Testing. The Plan never considers alternative population or job forecasts, nor how its proposals would collapse under slower growth or recession.
- A $1.5 Trillion Mirage. Over 25 years, the Plan piles on new tolls, mileage fees, parking taxes, and a proposed sales‑tax hike — yet funding still falls short by roughly $100,000 per resident, or $4,000 per person per year.
- Obsolete Cost Assumptions. The Plan uses 2019 transit cost estimates for a $500 billion transit program, ignoring that construction costs have since jumped 64%, undercounting capital costs by over $300 billion.
- Blind To Real Risks. Wildfire protection, water supply, health care, education, telecom, and stormwater infrastructure get little more than lip service. The Plan is a “Me First” money grab for the Transit & Housing Industrial Complex (THIC).
- Environmental Evasions. The Plan admits the majority of its environmental impacts are “significant and unavoidable,” then dumps the burden of solutions on local governments.
- Persistent Project Failures. The MTC and member agencies have proven over decades that they deliver projects hundreds of percent over budget and behind schedule while ridership is often 30% of promises.
- No Fiscal Foundation. Worst of all, the Plan skips any audit of the financial health of local governments, public works, schools, hospitals, or transit agencies — many already running structural deficits. Lacking that baseline, it cannot prioritize or fund what truly matters. A plan built on fiscal denial isn’t planning; it’s deception.
What’s Next:
SHIFT members have submitted extensive comments on the Plan and will continue publishing detailed analyses of its failings, and what is needed for a real, sustainable Bay Area strategy. Until then, treat any initiative tied to this Plan — or to the THIC — as dangerous, if not outright deception.
I’m motivated to share a few observations because PBA2050+ is so important to the health and well-being of the 9-county Bay Area. SHIFT is likely the key agency to organize action to be ready when the MTC staff brings PBA2050+ and the draft Plan EIR comments back to the MTC/ABAG Commission.
What are the goals?
1. To persuade MTC/ABAG commissioners to reject the PBA2050+ draft EIR, which is required before they can reject PBA2050+.
2. To keep building the case for legal action if/when they make policy decisions based on expediency, not data.
Suggestions:
1. Add all of the MTC/ABAG Commissioners to your email list.
2. Identify 1-3 reps from each of the 9 counties to cultivate the relationship with them by forwarding SHIFT info, letters, and articles, making calls, and/or meeting in person.
3. Follow Nancy Pelosi’s mantra: Count the votes! How many MTC/ABAG Commissioner votes will it take to reject the anticipated staff recommendations? From the hearings, we saw that Pat Burk (Palo Alto) and Pat Eklund (Marin) were two likely “no” votes.
4. Focus activities, as if this were an election campaign.
When it comes time for the MTC/ABAG Commissioners to vote:
• MTC/ABAG Commissioner’s first pivotal vote will be to declare conditions of overriding circumstances (the housing crisis), which gives justification to ignore the data re: (1) irrational, inconsistent population projections and (2)more than half of the EIR items having “significant and unavoidable” consequences.
• Their second vote, which can only be taken if they approve “overriding circumstances,” is to approve the draft PBA2050+ EIR, thereby making it the final EIR with standing through the next planning cycle.
• Only then do they get to the rubber-stamp vote to approve PBA2050+.
I’m linking the letter from the Marin County Executive, Derek Johnson, to MTC. You might recall that Marin BOS member Stephanie Moulton-Peters is the Vice Chair of the Commission.
Take a close look at his comments on page 3. Basically, he says, “yes, we know there are significant discrepancies with the population projections, but planning is so far along we shouldn’t address the problem now, but kick it down the road to the next planning cycle.”
https://assets.marincounty.gov/marincounty-prod/public/2025-12/2025-12%20County%20of%20Marin%20comment%20letter%20PBA%202050%2B%20MTC.pdf
MTC commissioners will love this kind of thinking. Constituents will be harmed. Key activity: Count the votes! Develop the SHIFT strategy to persuade the majority of MTC/ABAG Commissioners to do the right thing and vote for the safety and welfare of their constituents. Vote ‘no’ on staff recommendations to adopt PBA2050+.
Thanks again to SHIFT for taking the lead on this.
I might be retired, but I’m not disappeared
Best wishes,
Susan Kirsch, Founder & Director
Catalysts Institute for Local Control
POB 1703, Mill Valley, CA 94942
http://www.catalystsca.org
415-686-4375